Posts Tagged with Windows

News

AllThingsDigital Gets a Look Into Windows.Next

AllThingsDigital got a look into the next version of Windows, currently codenamed Windows 8. Take a look at it, and it may look familiar.

Credit: allthingsd.com

Looks a bit like Windows Phone 7, doesn’t it? So it appears as though we will get ”Windows Phone 7″ on tablets, but it will be Windows 8.

They also were able to get an exclusive interview with Steven Sinofsky, where he talked a bit about the next version of Windows.

This next version of Windows will be able to run applications in the current fashion (presumably .NET Framework, or any other currently supported), but interestingly enough, HTML5 and JavaScript. These applications will run in Internet Explorer 10, and “looks more like a mobile application, filling the full screen.”

More soon!

News

Steven Sinofsky About to Talk Windows.Next at D9

Steven Sinofsky has taken the stage at the AllThingsDigital D9 conference, where he is expected to demo the next version of Windows, expected to go by the name Windows 8.

As you can see in the screenshot to the right from This Is My Next, Windows.Next will certainly be unveiled to some extent today.

Sinofsky started off by saying, “You know I’m watching it and feeling like the guy who’s in the race and not winning it.”

More soon!

News

Microsoft: Windows Vista, 7 Have Much Lower Infection Rate, 1 Out of Every 14 Downloads is Malware

In the recent release of the Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (or SIR), Microsoft found that Windows Vista and Windows 7 have a significantly lower infection rate than that of Windows XP. In fact, Windows 7 has a 5x lower infection rate than Windows XP SP2, and 4x lower infection rate than Windows XP SP3.

Those figures are for the 32-bit version of Windows, so the infection rate for the 64-bit version of Windows 7 is nearly 8x and 6x less than that of Windows XP SP2 and SP3, respectively.

While some may point out that Windows XP still has a bigger market share than Windows 7, I would like to point out that this data is “normalized,” or as Microsoft says on page 35 of the report: “the infection rate for each version of Windows is calculated by comparing an equal number of computers per version (for example, 1,000 Windows XP SP2 computers to 1,000 Windows 7 RTM computers).”

As you can see, 64-bit infection rates are lower than their 32-bit brethren, which is likely due to a feature only available in the 64-bit version of Windows called Kernel Patch Protection (KPP). This feature prevents any modification to the Windows kernel, and if such a thing were to occur, the computer would shut down before any damage occurred. Another possible reason for having lower infections rates, according to the report, is “that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts.”

Now on to Internet Explorer 9, and information about the latest security feature of Internet Explorer 9: Application Reputation.

Internet Explorer blocks anywhere from 2 to 5 million malware attacks per day for IE8 and IE9 users, according to a blog post by the Internet Explorer Team. Since IE8 was released, SmartScreen has blocked over 1.5 billion attempted malware attacks.

IE7 was the first version of the browser to ship with SmartScreen, which was merely a URL-based reputation service to prevent phishing attacks. When IE8 came out, another protection mechanism was added, this time protecting against malware downloads. Just like the phishing filter introduced in IE7, IE8′s malware detection feature was also URL-based — so if the URL of the malware changed, it would no longer be identified as such.

Finally in IE9, a new feature called SmartScreen Application Reputation was introduced, which decided whether a file was malware or not by the hash of the file, along with the digital signature of the file as well. This allows IE9 to better inform users as to whether or not the file they are downloading is dangerous, because “When it comes to program downloads, other browsers today either warn on every file or don’t warn at all. Neither of these approaches helps the user make a better decision.”

Microsoft has found that out of every 14 programs downloaded, at least one is later identified as malware. IE9 can prevent new malware attacks before security products have the chance to receive a new definition which would see such files as malware, meaning IE9 can help protect users in the case that security solutions cannot. This is thanks to the unknown file warning bar that appears in Internet Explorer.

Some may find such a warning annoying, but 90% of downloads no longer show such warnings due to the data they currently have collected. Not only that, but Microsoft’s data also shows a user will only see such a warning two times per year.

What happens if someone decides to run an unknown program anyways? There is data for that: “clicking through the ‘unknown warning’ carries a risk between 25% and 70% of malware infection.”

The Take Away

The takeaway is simple: keep your computer operating system up to date. Windows XP is lacking in major security features, causing it to have much higher infection rates than any other Windows operating system on the market. While it can be expensive to upgrade your operating system, such as if you need to buy a new computer entirely, it may be worth it if you have a family who have a poor sense of security.

Also, if you know someone still running Internet Explorer 8, prod them to update to Internet Explorer 9, it is free, after all.

News

Intel: Microsoft Will Make a Few ARM Versions of Windows 8

Intel says that Microsoft will make four different versions of Windows 8 which will run on ARM processors, according to Bloomberg. But don’t worry, as from what Renee James said, there won’t be four different versions of Windows 8 for the ARM processor (Starter, Premium, Professional, Ultimate, etc.), but different versions of Windows 8 which will work with four different types of ARM processors (different manufacturers).

The downside of Windows 8 on ARM (System on a Chip) will be no backwards compatibility, meaning existing applications could not run on the platform. This has caused some to believe this will be bad for the Windows ecosystem — but in reality, it isn’t.

Why, you ask? If there will only be one version of Windows 8 that will run on ARM processors (but work on four different types of ARM processors) it will be Windows for Tablets, meaning there will be a completely different user interface. This is a good thing, as it would require developers to ensure their applications look and work correctly on the new form factor. After all, how would you like it if someone tried to take a Windows 7 application and just try to shove it on Windows Phone 7? If it was possible, it wouldn’t be very pretty.

All I am getting at is: this isn’t a big deal. Besides, Windows 8 for the desktop will continue to run older versions of Windows applications.

News

Microsoft Issues Security Bulletin Notification for May 2011, Updates Exploitability Index

As Microsoft does on a regular basis, they have issued an advanced security bulletin notification for May 2011, which contains two bulletins affecting Windows Server and Microsoft Office.

The first bulletin affecting Windows Server is rated as critical due to remote code execution, the following versions of Windows Server are affected: Windows Server 2003 SP2 (x86, x64, and Itanium-based systems), Windows Server 2008 (x86 and x64), Windows Server 2008 SP2 (x86 and x64), and Windows Server 2008 R2 RTM and SP1 (x64).

The second bulletin covers Microsoft Office, which is important with a “vulnerability impact” of remote code execution, and affects the following versions of Office: Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, Office 2007 SP2, Office 2004 for Mac, Office 2008 for Mac, Open XML File Format Converter for Mac, Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP2.

These security bulletins will be addressed next Tuesday, which is May 10, 2011.

Exploitability Index Update

Microsoft uses the Exploitability Index to let users know how likely it is that the vulnerability could be consistently exploited. However, currently the Exploitability Index provides an aggregated rating, meaning that all versions are grouped together. The problem is a lot of times newer versions of Microsoft software provide mitigation features making the vulnerabilities very hard to exploit, or they may be nonexistent.

With the updated Exploitability Index Microsoft will detail the possibilities of a consistent exploit of the vulnerability on the newest version of the software, then aggregate all the older versions together in a separate rating.

For more information, see: Exploitability Index Improvements Now Offer Additional Guidance.